EU Government Procurement- Procedure Type
In our Assessment of European Procurement Around Covid report, we sought to determine the extent to which different countries relied on direct contract awards, those contracts that were let without any competitive process.
Research* has previously indicated that contracts that were let by direct awards are 10% more expensive than those let by competitive processes.
Direct awards are by nature uncompetitive. They prevent the broader market from having the chance to meet the needs of the buyer. There is also the risk that it may stifle innovation: if a contract is not to subjected to a competitive review, there is little incentive for suppliers to adapt, or develop new or more efficient processes.
Direct awards are justified in response to ‘black swan’ events or natural disasters such as floods or providing PPE to frontline workers during a pandemic.
Our analysis shows a broad range of changes, with some countries using fewer rather than more direct awards. You can read our Assessment of European Procurement Around Covid here.
If you’d like to discuss this project, or your own procurement data needs in more detail,get in touch.
*Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2017). Uncovering High-Level Corruption: Cross-NationalCorruption Proxies Using Government Contracting Data. British Journal of Political Science
Mixing Politics & Procurement.
Improve Your Exporting With Government Data
Waiting For A Tsunami Of Text
Cleaning Up On Cleaning Contracts
New Procurement Bill Progresses Through Parliament
How Government Procurement Data Can Help Export Agencies
Government On Covid 19 Contracts
Global Analysis: Less Is Less
Using Data To Build A Supply Chain
Get Your Data Sorted.
The Importance of Government Procurement Data for Export Agencies
Lord’s Have Their Say On Procurement Bill
Buyers who stole Christmas (again)
How Government Procurement Data Can Help Export Agencies.
EU’s Ruling On Beneficial Ownership
Compelling research, insights and data directly into your inbox.