Government On Covid 19 Contracts

Government On Covid 19 Contracts

January 5, 2023
Government, Procurement

The government has published a document, providing further information about the procurement of critical testing equipment and services during the early months of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020.The document outlines the challenges of the situation for procurement:

“The exceptional circumstances in the early months of the pandemic meant there was significant global demand for testing goods and services, so the government had to procure these quickly to ensure the UK had the resources it needed.

To do this, testing goods and services were procured under Regulation 32 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. This allows public bodies to award contracts in exceptional circumstances such as an extreme emergency or because a product is only available from a particular supplier.

Most contracts awarded in the early months of the pandemic were awarded through this necessary route but as DHSC systems developed and market capacity grew, a new national framework and purchasing system was established to ensure competition when awarding contracts.

By 2022, the majority of testing contracts were awarded using the new framework and system, with very few contracts awarded using these emergency regulations. Where it is still applied, it is almost always because the product needed can only be provided by a particular supplier.”

The documentation goes on to outline the Government’s approach to fulfilling procurement contracts, explaining  that partnerships were critical to the programme and that the Government asked existing suppliers for support and a call was put out for wider industry to support the nation. Many suppliers provided services and goods to the wider COVID-19 response as well as to the testing network.One of the areas the Government has received heavy criticism is in the VIP fast lane contracts, often given to Tory supporters who were close to Government, and in some cases whose provision of equipment failed to meet standards or was otherwise unsuitable.  Certainly the UK was not alone in its challenges, with many Government’s transparency being tested.

According to the Government statement, offers of assistance to supply PPE equipment were received through  a purpose built GOV.UK portal and 4 dedicated DHSC mailboxes. Some offers of help were also routed through ministers’ offices, parliamentarians or senior officials.The 4 shared mailboxes used were for ‘COVID testing priority contacts’, ‘COVID19 innovation’, ‘COVID testing triage’ and ‘COVID19 offer triage’. These inboxes were used at different points between March 2020 and October 2021 to capture suppliers offering support for testing. Some suppliers emailed their offer directly to a mailbox (self-referring); offers from others were forwarded into a mailbox, or to relevant officials working on the response by ministers, parliamentarians and other parts of government.

Even though the National Audit Office criticised the use of a fast track procurement process during covid, this document attests that all offers of support were assessed and triaged by civil servants working on testing procurement and there was no separate VIP route or channel for testing suppliers, and that ministers were not involved in the evaluation or procurement process for contracts. However, for emails related to specific, urgent offers or to services or products that were high priority or were from a supplier with an established reputation in diagnostics, or wider health services, the email could be tagged as “VIP”, “Fast Track” or “Priority”. These tags helped the DHSC team to identify which offers and emails should be prioritised to ensure viable offers progressed quickly to meet the nation’s need for testing. The tags also helped officials to provide progress reports to ministers and senior colleagues. The tags purportedly did not relate to the status of the referrer and suppliers were not aware of the tagging system.

All offers were purportedly evaluated by commercial professionals against the same criteria, assessing value for money and their ability to meet the government’s rigorous standards and deliver the service required. The COVID-19 testing services provided by suppliers were often for complex or innovative scientific products or services so where necessary, an expert technical evaluation process was also carried out.

You can find further information in the Government’s statement here, and if you are interesting is viewing the awarded PPE contracts, you can view our table of all published medical contracts here.

Get in touch to find out more about our work in global government procurement, our data and research services.

June 6, 2023

Net Zero Needs Further Action, Says NAO

A new National Audit Office (NAO) report highlights that further action is needed by the UK Government to strengthen governance and delivery...
June 1, 2023

Critical Audit on Australia’s Frigate Procurement

The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) has recently released its findings into a review of the Department of Defence (Defence) 2018 procurement...
May 30, 2023

Space To Innovate- New UK Gov Opportunity

The UK Government's, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) Space Systems Programme has announced it is seeking proposals to aid UK Defence...
May 25, 2023

EU Commission Move To Electronic Procurement

The European Commissions Directorate Generate for Informatics (DIGIT), has launched a new dynamic purchasing system for software licences and associated services (SIDE...
May 22, 2023

Biosecure Procurement Trial

The UK Government yesterday announced new measures for domestic tree seed production and biosecurity procurement requirements. The next round of the Domestic...
May 18, 2023

New Industry Body White Paper Review of Covid Procurement

Since early on in the pandemic, there has been significant focus on the procurement of Covid related PPE, due to unprecedented nature...
May 11, 2023

EU Council Joint Procurement Under European Peace Facility

The European Union Council has adopted an assistance measure worth €1 billion under the European Peace Facility (EPF) that will further contribute...
May 10, 2023

Measuring Sustainable Public Procurement

One of the projects we are most proud of is working with The Open Contracting Partnership to create a Sustainable Public Procurement...
May 3, 2023

From Hero to Zero – UK Digital Marketplace Shuttered

Within living memory, the UK’s Crown Commercial Service (CCS) had planned to reshape a large swathe of public procurement in the image...
May 2, 2023

We Sell Data, Not Seats.

Why we sell data not seats? We're data analysts. We really understand the data we gather. We've been doing it for 15...
May 2, 2023

New Tech Disrupts Traditional Government Procurement

A Silicon Valley startup, GLASS, has created a revolutionary new tech, Glass Commerce, an e-commerce marketplace enabling compliant transactions between government buyers...
April 25, 2023

Green Public Procurement: New Report

At Spend Network, we are always on the look out for governments, think tanks, research bodies, and other organisations who are working...
April 25, 2023

EU Agrees on Anti-Coercion Instrument

The European Commission and European Parliament’s Committee on International Trade have agreed on an anti-coercion instrument (ACI) which will enable public procurement...
April 13, 2023

£256 Million Contract for Cyprus Awarded by UK Government

The UK Ministry of Defence  has awarded a £256 million contract, for work, repairs, servicing, and facilities management for the UK defence...
April 5, 2023

Endorsements For Export Agencies

Endorsements are a win-win for export agencies. Exporters face new challenges, both in terms of increased barriers to trade following the pandemic,...


Compelling research, insights and data directly into your inbox.

Recent media stories