Government On Covid 19 Contracts

Government On Covid 19 Contracts

January 5, 2023
Government, Procurement

The government has published a document, providing further information about the procurement of critical testing equipment and services during the early months of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020.The document outlines the challenges of the situation for procurement:

“The exceptional circumstances in the early months of the pandemic meant there was significant global demand for testing goods and services, so the government had to procure these quickly to ensure the UK had the resources it needed.

To do this, testing goods and services were procured under Regulation 32 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. This allows public bodies to award contracts in exceptional circumstances such as an extreme emergency or because a product is only available from a particular supplier.

Most contracts awarded in the early months of the pandemic were awarded through this necessary route but as DHSC systems developed and market capacity grew, a new national framework and purchasing system was established to ensure competition when awarding contracts.

By 2022, the majority of testing contracts were awarded using the new framework and system, with very few contracts awarded using these emergency regulations. Where it is still applied, it is almost always because the product needed can only be provided by a particular supplier.”

The documentation goes on to outline the Government’s approach to fulfilling procurement contracts, explaining  that partnerships were critical to the programme and that the Government asked existing suppliers for support and a call was put out for wider industry to support the nation. Many suppliers provided services and goods to the wider COVID-19 response as well as to the testing network.One of the areas the Government has received heavy criticism is in the VIP fast lane contracts, often given to Tory supporters who were close to Government, and in some cases whose provision of equipment failed to meet standards or was otherwise unsuitable.  Certainly the UK was not alone in its challenges, with many Government’s transparency being tested.

According to the Government statement, offers of assistance to supply PPE equipment were received through  a purpose built GOV.UK portal and 4 dedicated DHSC mailboxes. Some offers of help were also routed through ministers’ offices, parliamentarians or senior officials.The 4 shared mailboxes used were for ‘COVID testing priority contacts’, ‘COVID19 innovation’, ‘COVID testing triage’ and ‘COVID19 offer triage’. These inboxes were used at different points between March 2020 and October 2021 to capture suppliers offering support for testing. Some suppliers emailed their offer directly to a mailbox (self-referring); offers from others were forwarded into a mailbox, or to relevant officials working on the response by ministers, parliamentarians and other parts of government.

Even though the National Audit Office criticised the use of a fast track procurement process during covid, this document attests that all offers of support were assessed and triaged by civil servants working on testing procurement and there was no separate VIP route or channel for testing suppliers, and that ministers were not involved in the evaluation or procurement process for contracts. However, for emails related to specific, urgent offers or to services or products that were high priority or were from a supplier with an established reputation in diagnostics, or wider health services, the email could be tagged as “VIP”, “Fast Track” or “Priority”. These tags helped the DHSC team to identify which offers and emails should be prioritised to ensure viable offers progressed quickly to meet the nation’s need for testing. The tags also helped officials to provide progress reports to ministers and senior colleagues. The tags purportedly did not relate to the status of the referrer and suppliers were not aware of the tagging system.

All offers were purportedly evaluated by commercial professionals against the same criteria, assessing value for money and their ability to meet the government’s rigorous standards and deliver the service required. The COVID-19 testing services provided by suppliers were often for complex or innovative scientific products or services so where necessary, an expert technical evaluation process was also carried out.

You can find further information in the Government’s statement here, and if you are interesting is viewing the awarded PPE contracts, you can view our table of all published medical contracts here.

Get in touch to find out more about our work in global government procurement, our data and research services.

January 25, 2023

Mixing Politics & Procurement.

The need for administrations to act at pace is often at odds with the processes and procedures needed for good procurement. If...
January 24, 2023

Improve Your Exporting With Government Data

Government procurement data can be a valuable resource for export agencies looking to expand their business and identify new opportunities in foreign...
January 18, 2023

Waiting For A Tsunami Of Text

In a world where text can be generated by an algorithm for negligible costs, we have to rethink how we value the...
January 17, 2023

Cleaning Up On Cleaning Contracts

Canberra, in the Australian Capital Territory, is home to the nations houses of parliament and a large swathe of public sector. Transparency...
January 11, 2023

New Procurement Bill Progresses Through Parliament

The proposed new Procurement Bill passed its second reading without division in the House of Commons yesterday, with the Government proposing the...
January 10, 2023

How Government Procurement Data Can Help Export Agencies

Government procurement data, the information on what goods and services government entities purchase in different markets, is an extremely valuable, and often...
January 3, 2023

Global Analysis: Less Is Less

Analysing 7.5 million tender documents published by governments around the world has revealed a worrying trend of publishers providing less data for...
December 1, 2022

Using Data To Build A Supply Chain

All data has a provenance. It comes from somewhere. Someone created it. Maybe it came from a sensor, or it was created...
December 1, 2022

Get Your Data Sorted.

We collect tens of thousands of documents every day. We visit more than 700 sources to collect this data. That's what our...
December 1, 2022

The Importance of Government Procurement Data for Export Agencies

There are a number of ways that government procurement data can help export agencies, including: Identifying New Markets - By understanding what...
December 1, 2022

Lord’s Have Their Say On Procurement Bill

The proposed changes to the Procurement Bill are on their third reading in the House of Lords. Last week the House of...
December 14, 2022

Buyers who stole Christmas (again)

It’s time to shed a festive tear and feel some sympathy for all the bidding teams who’ve got bids to respond to...
December 1, 2022

How Government Procurement Data Can Help Export Agencies.

If you’re in the business of exporting, you know that the global market can be a tough one to crack. In order...
December 1, 2022

EU’s Ruling On Beneficial Ownership

Last week, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that public access to registries showing personal details about companies'...
December 1, 2022

Hungary’s Procurement Milestones Not Met

The European Commission has recently presented an assessment under the  procedure to Hungary that we covered recently here. The Commission found that,...


Compelling research, insights and data directly into your inbox.

Recent media stories