Measuring Life Cycle Costing

 Measuring Life Cycle Costing

July 21, 2022
Procurement

In this article from the Sustainable Public Procurement Toolkit, we explain how you can use data to measure and monitor progress against the goal of promoting life cycle costing approaches in procurement.

What is it?

Life-cycle costing or total cost of ownership refers to the accounting practice of determining the compound cost of an asset. In the context of procurement, buyers use life-cycle costing to evaluate the entire cost of owning something, typically a machine or similar. So the life cycle costing associated with a piece of equipment might include the original purchase, operating costs, licensing costs, maintenance costs, and disposal costs. Other elements that can be considered are failure costs and the cost of replacing parts.

Life-cycle costing can be applied to construction projects where buyers evaluate the cost of construction and then the cost of managing a building over a given period. This cost value can then be offset against its intended use, so for a school project, a ten-year life cycle cost can be measured against the number of students that will be educated during those years.

Why do it?

Life cycle costing has a role to play in securing long-term value for a buyer as well as reducing unnecessary wastage, and emphasizes the lifetime value of an asset. Not using life cycle costing leads to a focus on low, immediate costs and not paying attention to elevated servicing or maintenance costs associated with lower quality equipment. Understanding the life cycle cost of an asset has historically been even more difficult because it was hard to record and analyze data correctly. However, advances in computing and analysis capabilities have made it much easier to gather and analyze spending against an asset.

Today governments can more readily gain insights into the total cost of assets over time. This in turn allows buyers to purchase not just an item but a service that supports the use of an item. For instance, a construction project might include construction and management of the asset.

Using good procurement and combining it with spending data can give buyers even greater insight into the whole life cycle cost of their assets. The Open Contracting Data Standard can help power such analysis by linking the various stages of the procurement process.

Benefits

Understanding life cycle costing has multiple positive effects for those seeking to procure better social and environmental outcomes, including:

1) Using the data to demonstrate how you take value for money seriously, by considering the long term.
2)Reward suppliers and teams that are committed to delivering a high-quality product instead of securing a quick sale.
3) Good information on life cycle costing means using fewer resources for longer, reducing waste.

Getting started

Having identified an asset you want to measure, you need to combine the data that makes up its cost from multiple sources, but taking care to exclude irrelevant data. For instance, if you are seeking to measure the life cycle cost of a waste collection vehicle, you will want to include the cost of new tires, but not the cost of tires for road sweeping vehicles.

There is a wide range of analysis options in this area. Governments have very broad purchasing requirements from dental tools to defense vehicles and life cycle costing can be applied to most of these categories. Below we outline some of the cost features that you will need to include when conducting a lifecycle cost.

    1. Initial investment:
      1. The upfront cost of a product.
      2. Initial costs can be lessened by using financing options, but these need to be considered across the lifetime of a finance contract and any penalties that might be experienced.
    1. Maintenance:
      1. The cost of maintaining an asset can be included in the contract or priced separately
      2. Look for reliable evidence of maintenance costs from other users of the same or similar assets.
      3. Consider whether there are any restrictions on maintaining a product yourselves, e.g. does using an unqualified engineer to examine a laptop invalidate a warranty?
    1. Licenses:
      1. Assets may come with usage licenses or software that is used to run an asset may include a license. Be wary of costs around over usage or limitations on how you can use the software or data you enter into the system.
    1. Staffing:
      1. Be mindful of the time and resources required to manage an asset. You may choose to purchase on a supply and maintain basis, in this case it is tempting to believe that there is no staff time to be spent on the asset, but you will still need to manage the contract and monitor and evaluate the supplier’s work. Every asset will consume staff time, be sure to assess this cost conservatively.

Options for data use

At the beginning of this section, we introduced ten different ways in which you can use data to drive and measure sustainability in your procurement. From these options, we have selected four that can be especially useful for life cycle costing approaches:

Forecast contract impact (Option 4)

In its simplest form, a life cycle cost can be derived from historical data on contracts associated with an asset and used to form an estimate of life cycle costing. For instance, the life cycle cost of a computer server should also include electricity as well as staff time to maintain it. Using the information on contracts can be enough to establish a benchmark for further analysis.

Monitor contract performance (Option 7)

When life cycle costing is established as the method for determining the value of an SPP contract, combining accounts payable data with contracting data is the most accurate way to monitor costs throughout the contract. By linking actual payments, or a share of payments to an asset, it is possible to derive detailed costs for an asset. One way to do this is by tagging payable data with a specific accounting code that ties expenditure to an asset or assets.

Sample indicators

Better data on the way that contracts are marshaled can give buyers real insights into the cost of running a service. This gives governments the ability to make sound investment decisions but also to avoid wasting money on products that don’t deliver value for money for the taxpayer.

Good life cycle data can improve trust in government through thorough reporting of decisions. This can be supported by publicly demonstrating that good investment decisions are being made, sharing data to encourage better purchasing practices, and avoiding reporting about government waste from purchasing the wrong products.

In addition to public statements on policy implementations, the data can be used to generate a viable feedback loop that provides detailed information on the effectiveness of life cycle costing. This includes sharing data on the most costly features of running different types of assets, knowing which data to record before making a purchase decision, and gathering data throughout contracts to better understand whether costs are deviating.

With robust data in place, it will be possible to identify and work with the most successful teams to determine the success factors that can support other buyers to have a positive impact.

In the toolkit, we introduced an M&E Framework for measuring progress against sustainability goals. Below are some examples of possible outcomes and indicators to track the application of life cycle costing approaches:

GOALS
OUTCOMES
INDICATORS
INFORMATION NEEDS
CALCULATION METHOD
OPTIONS FOR RECORDING THE DATA YOU NEED
Promoting life cycle costing approaches
Introducing life cycle costing into the procurement process
Share of re-tenders where the value is based on life cycle costing calculations of previous contract
– Number of re-tenders where the value is based on life cycle costing calculations of previous contract – Total number of re-tenders
Re-tenders where the value is based on life cycle costing calculations of previous contract / Total number of re-tenders
Promoting life cycle costing approaches
Introducing life-cycle costing into the procurement process
Value share of re-tenders where the value is based on life cycle costing calculations of previous contract
– Value of re-tenders where the value is based on life cycle costing calculations – Total value of re-tenders
Value of re-tenders where the value is based on life cycle costing calculations / Total number of tenders
Promoting life cycle costing approaches
Introducing life cycle costing into the tendering process
Share of tenders which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations
– Number of tenders that base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations – Total number of tenders
Number of tenders which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations / Total number of tenders
Promoting life cycle costing approaches
Introducing life cycle costing into the tendering process
Value share of tenders which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations
– Value of tenders which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations – Total value of tenders
Value of tenders which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations / Total number of tenders
Promoting life cycle costing approaches
Driving SPP through life cycle costing approaches
Share of tenders which include a carbon budget based on estimated life cycle carbon emissions
– Number of tenders which include a carbon budget based on estimated life cycle carbon emissions – Total number of tenders
Number of tenders which include a carbon budget based on estimated life cycle carbon emissions / Total number of tenders
Promoting Life-cycle costing approaches
Driving SPP through life cycle costing approaches
Value share of tenders which include a carbon budget based on estimated life cycle emissions
– Value of tenders which include a carbon budget based on estimated life cycle carbon emissions – Total value of tenders
Value of tenders which include a carbon budget based on estimated life cycle carbon emissions / Total number of tenders
Promoting Life-cycle costing approaches
Driving SPP through life cycle costing approaches
Number of contracts classified as SPP which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations
– Number of contracts classified as SPP which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations – Total number of contracts
Number of contracts classified as SPP which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations / Total number of contracts
Promoting Life-cycle costing approaches
Driving SPP through life cycle costing approaches
Value share of contracts classified as SPP which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations
– Value of contracts classified as SPP which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations – Total value of contracts
Value of contracts classified as SPP which base the cost score for each bid on life cycle costing calculations / Total value of contracts
Promoting Life-cycle costing approaches
Increasing cost savings through life cycle costing calculations
Value saved by using life cycle calculations to set contract value
– Cheapest bid for a particular tender (based on acquisition price) – Projected life cycle cost of cheapest bid – Projected life cycle cost of the selected bid
Projected life cycle cost of cheapest bid – Projected life cycle cost of the selected bid
Get in touch with us to discuss  how we can assist with your government procurement data needs.
August 10, 2022

Shifts Towards Sustainable Sourcing

A while ago,  we shared an article on findings by the Boston Consulting Group and the World Economic Forum that showed procurement is responsible...
August 9, 2022

Supporting Sustainable Procurement In The Construction Industry

Construction projects are usually long and complex, involving the participation of different stakeholders throughout the different project stages. There are certain factors...
August 4, 2022

Why Is Open SPP Important In The Construction Sector?

The construction industry is estimated to account for 6% of global GDP, with Africa's construction market valued at around USD 5.4 billion...
August 2, 2022

US Advances Equity And Economic Opportunity Through Procurement.

With the implementation of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, the Biden-Harris Administration set an objective to ensure federal investments built wealth and opportunity...
July 28, 2022

5 Reasons To Export To Government

If you want to grow exports, you should start with the largest and most transparent industry in the world, and here are...
July 26, 2022

Sustainable Public Procurement and Economic Development

What is it? For many industries contracting has become a global affair. Governments are rightly keen to gain economic advantages from a...
July 19, 2022

Measuring Gender Inclusion

What Is Gender Inclusion Measurement? To reduce the barriers women-led businesses face in public procurement markets, we need to be able to...
July 14, 2022

Measuring Carbon Reduction

What Is Carbon Reduction in Procurement About? Governments and companies are setting deadlines for achieving zero emissions. Public procurement can be used...
July 7, 2022

Measuring Sustainable Public Procurement

What is 'sustainable public procurement' uptake? Sustainable public procurement (SPP) uptake levels are about knowing how much sustainable public procurement is being...
July 5, 2022

Options For Data Use

There are different ways in which open data can be used to drive and measure progress against sustainability goals. So as part...
June 30, 2022

Open Data & Measuring Progress

We believe all public procurement should be sustainable and open. Recently, with our partners Open Contracting and Public, we launched a new...
June 28, 2022

Blacklisting Needs Kid Gloves

In the UK’s House of Lords debate on procurement reform, there was some forthright questioning within the government on whether Bain and...
June 22, 2022

Bain’s Woes in RSA Raises Questions in Parliament

Last week in a Lords Chamber debate, Lord Peter Hain asked why Bain & Company were still able to bid for multi-million-pound...
June 22, 2022

Procurement and impact

Governments spend over 13tn USD a year with their suppliers, or around 15% of global GDP. We’ve started analysing the carbon intensity...
June 16, 2022

Australian Pandemic PPE Contracts Cause Concern.

Much of the last two years have seen governments all over the world in a purchasing panic due to the pandemic. Understandably...

Newsletter

Compelling research, insights and data directly into your inbox.

Recent media stories

The Times
May 30, 2022
CIPFA
August 3, 2021

Search

Scroll to Top