National Capital Authority Under Procurement Scrutiny

National Capital Authority Under Procurement Scrutiny

June 9, 2022
Open data, Procurement

The National Capital Authority (NCA) was established in 1989 under the Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988 (PALM Act) following the introduction of self-government to the Australian Capital Territory.

The authority’s mission is ‘to shape Canberra as a capital that all Australians can be proud of by ensuring it is well planned, managed and promoted, consistent with its enduring national significance.’

Procurement is a core business of the NCA. It had been more than 13 years since the last NCA performance audit, so the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) recently completed a review, with the objective of examining whether the NCA’s procurement activities are complying with the Commonwealth Procurement Rules (CPR’s) and demonstrating the achievement of value for money.

Its findings were concerning. The ANAO report found:

  1. NCA’s insufficient use of open and competitive procurement processes, non-compliance with the CPRs, and poor transparency and record-keeping meant it could not demonstrate value for money across its procurement activities.
  2. The NCA makes insufficient use of open and competitive procurement processes. Where open tenders were conducted, it was common for request documentation to limit the extent of effective competition. Where suppliers were directly approached, the pool of potential tenderers was often limited to those previously engaged by the NCA or described by the NCA as being known to the NCA or its advisers. With respect to the assessment processes undertaken, just over half of the contracts were awarded to the candidate where documentation demonstrated that it offered the best value for money. The conduct of procurements was also not to a consistent ethical standard.
  3. ****Procurement decision-making has not been sufficiently accountable and transparent. Approval had been obtained by an appropriate delegate in most of the contracts examined. It was common for there to be gaps in the records of the planning and conduct of procurements. The NCA’s reporting of contracts and amendments on AusTender was largely non-compliant with the requirements under the CPRs.

To contextualise this report, note that in 2019–20 and 2020–21, there were 327 contracts with a total value of $69.9 million reported by the NCA on the AusTender website.

The ANAO report lists the following support material to their findings:

  1. The majority (64 percent) of procurement valued above the $80,000 threshold in the CPRs undertaken by the NCA in 2019–20 and 2020–21 did not involve open competitive approaches. In comparison, other non-corporate Commonwealth entities are much more likely to report using competitive procurement approaches. (See paragraphs 2.3 to 2.26)
  2. ****For just over half of the procurement examined by the ANAO, appropriate written records were made of the justification for using limited tender processes and how value for money was achieved. (See paragraphs 2.30 to 2.32)
  3. For 60 percent of the contracts examined in detail, it was evident that relevant evaluation criteria were included in request documentation. For the remaining 40 percent, either the request documentation did not include any evaluation criteria or there were no records of the request documentation on file. (See paragraphs 2.54 to 2.57)
  4. With respect to the assessment processes undertaken, just over half of the contracts examined in detail by the ANAO were awarded to the candidate where documentation demonstrated that it offered the best value for money. In the remaining 45 percent of contracts where value for money outcomes had not been demonstrated, this was primarily the result of insufficient analysis being presented commensurate with the scale of the procurement or the result of poor record-keeping practices. Of note was that the essential requirements and/or evaluation criteria applied during the evaluation process were not consistent with the approach to the market in 88 percent of contracts examined (where sufficient documentation was maintained). (See paragraphs 2.60 to 2.68).

Transparency is not a difficult thing to achieve, but it does require a fundamental organisational commitment to it. As advocates for procurement transparency, we hope this ANAO report will encourage a shift towards greater transparency of process, across all government departments.

Get in touch with us if you’d like to discuss our government procurement data, our research and development capabilities, or how we can assist with your data needs.

Because you read this article, you may be interested in UK Left Waiting On Transparency

Photo by Harry Burk

June 30, 2022

Open Data & Measuring Progress

We believe all public procurement should be sustainable and open. Recently, with our partners Open Contracting and Public, we launched a new...
June 28, 2022

Blacklisting Needs Kid Gloves

In the UK’s House of Lords debate on procurement reform, there was some forthright questioning within the government on whether Bain and...
June 22, 2022

Bain’s Woes in RSA Raises Questions in Parliament

Last week in a Lords Chamber debate, Lord Peter Hain asked why Bain & Company were still able to bid for multi-million-pound...
June 22, 2022

Procurement and impact

Governments spend over 13tn USD a year with their suppliers, or around 15% of global GDP. We’ve started analysing the carbon intensity...
June 16, 2022

Australian Pandemic PPE Contracts Cause Concern.

Much of the last two years have seen governments all over the world in a purchasing panic due to the pandemic. Understandably...
June 16, 2022

Goodbye KPIs, Hello Data Quality

There’s a truth to Tom Peter’s famous quote “what gets measured, gets done”. Peters was a writer and thinker on management practice...
June 7, 2022

Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity Begins

A group of Indo-Pacific nations has banded together to begin the process of developing an Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity. This framework...
May 31, 2022

Stormy Times For Meteorological Procurement

The UK government faces trial in the High Court over its award of an £854 million contract for a new Meteorological Office...
May 25, 2022

UK Left Waiting On Transparency

The UK’s latest procurement bill promises much, but many of the technical details remain to be defined. The drafting of the procurement...
May 24, 2022

Empty Fishing Lakes.

We’ve written before about frameworks, but some improved analysis from our brilliant data team made us think it was time to revisit...
May 11, 2022

Collaborative Procurement For The Construction Industry

The Centre for Built Britain has released a white paper on Procurement Strategies for incentivising collaborative delivery, which explores how a collaborative...
May 12, 2022

MoD £2 Billion in Nuclear Contracts.

Britain's Ministry of Defence announced this week that over £2 billion worth of defence contracts have been awarded to start the third...
May 10, 2022

New Support For Canadian SME Traders.

The Government of Canada recently released its 2022 Federal Budget. Within it was an announcement of an intention to establish a Trade...
April 29, 2022

Progressive Procurement Yields Results

Last year, we shared the results of the landmark Aboriginal Procurement policy (APP), first introduced by Western Australia’s Premier, Mark MacGowan in...
June 16, 2022

Cutting Carbon Is A Procurement Issue

Just a few months ago, we shared an article on findings by the Boston Consulting Group and the World Economic Forum that showed procurement...

Newsletter

Compelling research, insights and data directly into your inbox.

Recent media stories

The Times
May 30, 2022
CIPFA
August 3, 2021

Search

Scroll to Top