The little codes that hold our world together

December 17, 2020
Data

Have you noticed that your email address is completely unique? Its obvious that this would be true, but it bears thinking about. In all the millions and millions of email addresses there isn’t another like yours, if there was another like yours there would be no way for your colleagues and friends to send a note to just you.

Uniqueness is a critical feature that is required for email to work. We’ve known that uniqueness is important for handling information: your address is unique, published books have a unique ISBN number and cars have unique registrations.

We do this so that we can tie our information together effectively, and once that’s in place we can build services on top of that. Imagine an insurance service that didn’t have a way of differentiating between cars, or a library that couldn’t differentiate between two books with the same title? Identifiers look geeky and impenetrable, but they’re actually the glue that holds the service together. To libraries ISBN codes are as important as the shelves and the roof, they are part of the infrastructure that our services are built on and without them, our services would struggle to function.

Government has been trying to bring the codes that are used in the different parts of the public sector together into a single set of codes. The work of the registers team is an important in building a full understanding of what the public sector is made up of, but it is a combination of lists that get updated, rather than a canonical register of every body in the public sector. Its a great start, but it needs more investment and proper support from within government.

The lack of well organised, unique codes for public sector bodies is especially problematic when you try to understand an activity that happens in lots of different parts of the public sector, like giving a grant for instance. Grants are awarded by all sorts of public bodies to all sorts of other bodies, but when there are no codes for the organisation that awarded the grant, it can be really hard to ‘zoom out’ from individual grants and try and understand how those grants might be grouped together. So, without codes you can’t know how many grants were made by local councils, or how many codes were made by organisations in London, or who received the money.

In fact, if you try to do any form of financial analysis across different parts of government, you quickly become unstuck, because we don’t have the underlying infrastructure to link data back to a single record. Which means that people use the data references that they think is best, but that good intent doesn’t work when you try and analyse the data.
Below is the list of different names that the Department of Health used to describe itself itself in contract award notices between 2016 and 2018. Eleven of these records describe the same organisation, one describes two organisations:

  • Ambulance Radio Programme, Department of Health
  • Department Health
  • Department of Health
  • Department Of Health
  • DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
  • Department of Health (DH)
  • Department Of Health (Government)
  • DoH — Public Health Agency
  • The Department of Health c/o Ambulance Radio Programme
  • The Department of Health c/o Ambulances Radio Programme
  • The Secretary of State for Health acting as part of the Crown through the Commercial Medicines Unit (part of the Department of Health)
  • The Secretary of State for Health acting as part of the Crown through the Department of Health

In computing terms we call codes like ISBN and passport numbers identifiers, because the codes let us know that we’re referring to one, specific thing. In the same way that not having proper identifiers means that our letters go missing and our books don’t get returned, when we don’t have identifiers for public organisations, our understanding of grantmaking, procurement and budgets is always going to be compromised; data goes missing and simple questions like “Which councils have given grants to Barnardos?” can’t be answered.

Without identifiers, we can’t analyse what we should be able to analyse, but can’t even know what data is missing. Instead, we fumble around trying to guess what is happening. However, even when codes do exist, we’re not using them properly. Every company and every charity has a unique identifier that can be used when they receive a grant or a contract, but when public bodies publish data about who won those grants and contracts don’t add identifiers, so we can’t understand who awarded the grant or who received it.

You might think this doesn’t matter, but when we spend £300bn every year with suppliers, and when Carillion went into administration, the government had to ask Carillion where all of their contracts were. If we don’t know where the contracts are, how can we make sense of whether there’s a risk to the taxpayer and the service user from poor contracting?

December 2, 2021

We Don’t Want Your Trust.

Not because we're shifty. We're not. You don't have to trust us. Specifically, you don't have to trust our data. If you...
November 30, 2021

Intelligent Procurement Fraud Is Coming.

Are you ready for artificial intelligence fraud? We've already written about the almost magical capabilities of artificial intelligence here. We're using it...
November 18, 2021

What Do You Want To Predict?

Machine learning is changing the world. Spend Network is already using machine learning to categorize all of our documents. The results are...
November 17, 2021

New Government IT Procurement Opportunities For Smaller Businesses.

The autumn budget included an announcement that HM Revenue and Customs will receive approximately £750m over the next three years to upgrade...
November 11, 2021

What does good data look like?

If you're lucky, poor data will only make you look inefficient, but if you're unlucky, it will make a real mess of...
November 9, 2021

Greek Defence Spends Billions On Cyber, Navy and Aerospace.

In early September, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis outlined major defence procurement plans as a way to overhaul its loss-making Greek defence...
November 4, 2021

Pressures Mounts On UK Procurement Processes

The UK Government has come under renewed pressure after being ordered to reveal the names of companies that were directly awarded significant...
November 2, 2021

South Korea Targets SME Growth Through Health Procurement

When selling to governments, SME's often have challenges with matching the buying power and supply chain strength of larger organisations. For the...
October 26, 2021

List Of UK Tender Sources.

Our list of tender sources in the UK extends to over 180 individual publishers. If you use Spend Network you can access...
October 20, 2021

Canada Levels Up Procurement For Young Entrepreneurs.

Canadian not-for-profit organisation Futurpreneur,  has partnered with the Canadian Aboriginal and Minority Supplier Council (CAMSC), on a project to diversify the Canadian...
October 19, 2021

Delivery Guaranteed.

Our customers are the special ones. We make the bricks, they build the houses. They're the ones that make it easy to...
October 14, 2021

Contracting Emissions

We are launching a new analysis; the carbon emitted by the public sector's supply chain (scope three emissions). We're calling it Contracting...
October 12, 2021

The Services Sector Opens Up

The WTO have announced a new agreement on the regulation of the services sector in over sixty countries. The deal ensures more...
October 7, 2021

Greece Spends €3 Billion in French Defence Deal.

A few weeks back, when the US, UK and Australian governments announced their surprise military pact, France wore the brunt of the...
October 5, 2021

UK Government £650 Billion Pipeline.

The UK Government has released plans for the investment of £650 billion of public and private cash into infrastructure projects across the...

Newsletter

Compelling research, insights and data directly into your inbox.

Recent media stories

Search

Scroll to Top