Time To Build More Open Products For Government

January 7, 2021
Procurement

Ian Makgill, Founder Spend Network

Just before Christmas, DXC (formerly Hewlett Packard) was awarded a contract for £430,000 by the Business Services Organisation for on going support of EPES system, the rationale for the contract award was as follows:

Without EPES the monthly annual payments to the independent contractors of some GBP 700 million per annum cannot be made and all EPES associated BSO Business Services and prescription fraud prevention activities will cease.

So far so good, I wouldn’t want the government not to pay contractors and I don’t think anyone would want anti-fraud activities to grind to a halt.

The problem here is that there was only one bidder and DXC could, by and large, name their price. Why was this service not open to competition?

Following a competitive procurement process a contract was signed with Hewlett-Packard now DXC on 28 July 2006. DXC retains the intellectual property rights of the entire EPES solution.

That’s right.

Despite the government specifying the system, despite paying hundreds of thousands to have it built, despite all the time spent operating and using the system, every element of the IP relating to that system belongs to the contractor.

That means that no one other than DXC can ever work on that system, no one else can improve it, no one else can develop a new module for the system and every upgrade must come from DXC.

It is a tiny monopoly all of its own.

It is time, for the governments around the world to do away with this sort of practice.

Sure, buy software where there is a fair market and reasonable competition to deliver an equivalent service. Governments shouldn’t be building their own email clients for instance, but in the current market if a provider of email software started trying to price gouge, the government can just move to another supplier.

The same principle doesn’t apply if you need bespoke software to be written, in that scenario, you need to either build it yourself or buy in the services to build the software, but that should mean buying not just the functionality but the ability to replicate that functionality in the future.

When it comes to “build or buy” the one place you should never be is paying to build and then not owning the outcome.

If you’re going to pay to build, do it with an open license, then anyone can build on it, anyone can improve on it and suppliers don’t end up with monopolies over delivery.

Please get in touch if you’d like to discuss our projects or services.

January 13, 2021

How Long Does It Take A Department To Publish A Contract Notice?

Public sector organisations have, according to guidance, thirty days to publish details of their contracts online. So, thirty days after a contract...
January 12, 2021

Controversial Food Box Contractors Face Scrutiny

There is increased scrutiny for the suppliers of food boxes provided to the chronically ill and those asked to shelter through the...
January 7, 2021

£550 Million Missile Contract Signed.

Yesterday defence Defence Minister Jeremy Quin announced a £550 million contract was awarded for new surge-attack missile The contract award promises 'hundreds...
December 23, 2020

New Year, New Tool. Introducing Our New Classifier.

Our New Solution To Classification In 2020, we developed an advanced classifier. This tool adds multiple labels to procurement notices based on...
December 18, 2020

The buyers that spoiled Christmas 2020

Welcome to our annual run down of the buyers that are most likely to spread misery for suppliers at Christmas. Here are...
December 17, 2020

Why Blacklisting Is Harder Than You Think.

Sadly, we don't have to look far to find examples of suppliers being accused of illegality. The Grenfell enquiry heard evidence that...
December 17, 2020

Build Back Younger?

Joe Biden's exhortation to 'build back better', which has also been used by Boris Johnson, is broadly equivalent to the more arch...
December 17, 2020

UK Government Launches Plans To Transform Procurement.

The UK government yesterday launched a green paper, a series of proposed changes to procurement rules, purporting to put transparency and increased...
December 23, 2020

More Governments Improve Transparency.

It is always encouraging to see government procurement transparency improving around the world. Brazil and Cote d'Ivoire have both recently applied to...
December 14, 2020

Life in The Fast Lane

The NAO has just published a report criticising the Government for using a 'fast-lane', where suppliers that were known to MPs were...
December 14, 2020

Adding Value

We're analysts. We work with data, every day. We know what works and what doesn't work. We know about values that can't...
December 14, 2020

Visualise your data

Harness the power of procurement data to make informed decisions. Using our advanced analytics, we can create custom visualisations and dashboards for...
December 14, 2020

Clean and enrich your data

Cleanse all of the supplier records within your organisation, creating a single, consolidated record with rich information to help you make better...
December 17, 2020

Classify your data

We have built a state-of-the-art algorithm just to categorise procurement data. Work with us to categorise millions of records with stunning accuracy...
December 17, 2020

Analysis for the $13trn global market

If you need authoritative, evidence-based insight to apply to a broader strategic challenge, we're here to help. Unlike other consultants, we start...

Newsletter

Compelling research, insights and data directly into your inbox.

Recent media stories

Welp Magazine
December 23, 2020
FT PPE Story
The Financial Times
December 9, 2020

Search