Time To Build More Open Products For Government

January 31, 2021
Procurement

Ian Makgill, Founder Spend Network

Just before Christmas, DXC (formerly Hewlett Packard) was awarded a contract for £430,000 by the Business Services Organisation for on going support of EPES system, the rationale for the contract award was as follows:

Without EPES the monthly annual payments to the independent contractors of some GBP 700 million per annum cannot be made and all EPES associated BSO Business Services and prescription fraud prevention activities will cease.

So far so good, I wouldn’t want the government not to pay contractors and I don’t think anyone would want anti-fraud activities to grind to a halt.

The problem here is that there was only one bidder and DXC could, by and large, name their price. Why was this service not open to competition?

Following a competitive procurement process a contract was signed with Hewlett-Packard now DXC on 28 July 2006. DXC retains the intellectual property rights of the entire EPES solution.

That’s right.

Despite the government specifying the system, despite paying hundreds of thousands to have it built, despite all the time spent operating and using the system, every element of the IP relating to that system belongs to the contractor.

That means that no one other than DXC can ever work on that system, no one else can improve it, no one else can develop a new module for the system and every upgrade must come from DXC.

It is a tiny monopoly all of its own.

It is time, for the governments around the world to do away with this sort of practice.

Sure, buy software where there is a fair market and reasonable competition to deliver an equivalent service. Governments shouldn’t be building their own email clients for instance, but in the current market if a provider of email software started trying to price gouge, the government can just move to another supplier.

The same principle doesn’t apply if you need bespoke software to be written, in that scenario, you need to either build it yourself or buy in the services to build the software, but that should mean buying not just the functionality but the ability to replicate that functionality in the future.

When it comes to “build or buy” the one place you should never be is paying to build and then not owning the outcome.

If you’re going to pay to build, do it with an open license, then anyone can build on it, anyone can improve on it and suppliers don’t end up with monopolies over delivery.

Please get in touch if you’d like to discuss our projects or services.

April 14, 2021

Selling to procurement: No One Cares About Your Product

Selling to procurement professionals is something that most people find frustrating, mainly because they are highly resistant to direct sales. Why? Well,...
April 7, 2021

8 Reasons Why Procurement Doesn’t Need Blockchain.

Blockchain is fundamentally a database, but rather than a database where one item is allowed to replace another, each change to the...
March 25, 2021

Procurement Transparency Suffers Under Covid-19

Government publishing of procurement notices has fallen significantly following the global spread of Covid-19. The total number of tender notices published globally...
March 20, 2021

South Africa, Kenya lead the way on African transparency.

Both South Africa and Kenya lead the way in procurement transparency according to our data, South Africa and Kenya publish more tender...
March 16, 2021

Missing Data Is A Known Unknown

There is a famous quote about the fragility of knowledge by Donald Rumsfeld, the hawkish US Secretary of Defence during the Iraq...
March 4, 2021

NZ Government Pharmaceutical Procurement Review

The New Zealand Government is taking steps to improve its procurement of national medicine supply through a review process. The Pharmaceutical Management...
February 28, 2021

The Problem With Frameworks

-Ian Makgill In my last post, I covered off framework agreements, and the advantages of using them for both government and suppliers.In this...
February 28, 2021

Do Framework Agreements Have Value?

-Ian Makgill Framework agreements are like umbrella agreements, and are usually made with a group of providers to supply a set of...
February 28, 2021

NSW Aims To Reserve Procurement Budgets For SMEs

We're always pleased to see governments around the world improving their procurement processes, by broadening opportunities for all types of business to...
February 28, 2021

Creating Synergy Between Politics & Procurement.

The need for administrations to act at pace is often at odds with the processes and procedures needed for good procurement. If...
February 28, 2021

Canada Launches Green Procurement

We are always pleased to see governments taking steps towards better procurement practices. Recently, the Canadian Government took a step forward for...
February 28, 2021

Not All Data Is The Same: Rules For Data Integrity.

-Ian Mackill Not all data is the same. It might have come from the same source, but how it gets treated is...
February 4, 2021

Post Brexit Procurement – What Will Change?

With the Brexit transition period officially behind us, it's worth considering the potential impacts of Brexit on Government procurement into the future....
February 28, 2021

Where Next For Data Led Procurement in Europe? A Discussion.

The They Buy For You  Project (TBFY) concluded on 31 December 2020. To mark the occasion, we look back at three years...
February 28, 2021

Spending $400bn – A Demanding Task For Biden.

-Fiona Hunt As my colleague Ian wrote this week, governments are increasingly looking to procurement to deliver better social outcomes. President Biden...

Newsletter

Compelling research, insights and data directly into your inbox.

Recent media stories

Search