The Problem With Frameworks

February 28, 2021
Procurement

Ian Makgill

In my last post, I covered off framework agreements, and the advantages of using them for both government and suppliers.In this post I cover some of their less attractive features.

Frameworks act to moderate the way in which buyers test a market, which is all well and good, but they do have some problems.

They can suppress competition.

If you are moderating how you test a market, that instrument by its very nature, is going to have the potential to prevent and stymy competition. Unduly long frameworks and frameworks with very small numbers of suppliers are going to cause problems.

For instance, a ten year framework let to one supplier has the potential to create a monopoly position for that supplier. The buyer is effectively saying that no worthy innovation will happen in that market during the framework. As an instrument, frameworks are open to abuse.

There are too many of them.

Frameworks can be problematic for suppliers too: they have a tendency to proliferate. In 2007 we discovered that there were over 90 frameworks for recruitment in UK local government. There was more than one framework for every four councils. Many of these frameworks saw minimal business and created a burdensome bidding process for suppliers with no positive outcome. They were fishing licenses to empty lakes.

They lack transparency.

Frameworks are frustratingly opaque, partly because of practicalities, but also because administrations have been reluctant to try and police publishing of this data. Further competitions are usually only advertised to the suppliers on framework, and there’s a good reason for this. Buyers don’t want to give the wider market the impression that they can bid and win a contract that isn’t open to everyone, however,  by not publishing this data, buyers also make it impossible to follow up and find out who won the subsequent award. So there is often no requirement to publish what is happening under frameworks, creating the potential for billions to be spent without any accountability.

Evidence of value is weak.

There really is no strong evidence that savings occur through the use of frameworks alone. The lack of transparency around frameworks obviously makes the job of evidencing savings much harder, but where we can see evidence of savings, it appears to be linked to the number of bidders on a further competition rather than the act of creating a framework.

In conclusion, framework contracts are broadly a good way to manage the process of running two stage competitions, but they are opaque, hard to analyse and prone to proliferation. Better data on their use and application could really help to improve their efficiency.

Here at Spend Network, we are proud of our global expertise in government procurement data. If we can assist you with your data or research needs, please get in touch.

December 2, 2021

We Don’t Want Your Trust.

Not because we're shifty. We're not. You don't have to trust us. Specifically, you don't have to trust our data. If you...
November 30, 2021

Intelligent Procurement Fraud Is Coming.

Are you ready for artificial intelligence fraud? We've already written about the almost magical capabilities of artificial intelligence here. We're using it...
November 18, 2021

What Do You Want To Predict?

Machine learning is changing the world. Spend Network is already using machine learning to categorize all of our documents. The results are...
November 17, 2021

New Government IT Procurement Opportunities For Smaller Businesses.

The autumn budget included an announcement that HM Revenue and Customs will receive approximately £750m over the next three years to upgrade...
November 11, 2021

What does good data look like?

If you're lucky, poor data will only make you look inefficient, but if you're unlucky, it will make a real mess of...
November 9, 2021

Greek Defence Spends Billions On Cyber, Navy and Aerospace.

In early September, Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis outlined major defence procurement plans as a way to overhaul its loss-making Greek defence...
November 4, 2021

Pressures Mounts On UK Procurement Processes

The UK Government has come under renewed pressure after being ordered to reveal the names of companies that were directly awarded significant...
November 2, 2021

South Korea Targets SME Growth Through Health Procurement

When selling to governments, SME's often have challenges with matching the buying power and supply chain strength of larger organisations. For the...
October 26, 2021

List Of UK Tender Sources.

Our list of tender sources in the UK extends to over 180 individual publishers. If you use Spend Network you can access...
October 20, 2021

Canada Levels Up Procurement For Young Entrepreneurs.

Canadian not-for-profit organisation Futurpreneur,  has partnered with the Canadian Aboriginal and Minority Supplier Council (CAMSC), on a project to diversify the Canadian...
October 19, 2021

Delivery Guaranteed.

Our customers are the special ones. We make the bricks, they build the houses. They're the ones that make it easy to...
October 14, 2021

Contracting Emissions

We are launching a new analysis; the carbon emitted by the public sector's supply chain (scope three emissions). We're calling it Contracting...
October 12, 2021

The Services Sector Opens Up

The WTO have announced a new agreement on the regulation of the services sector in over sixty countries. The deal ensures more...
October 7, 2021

Greece Spends €3 Billion in French Defence Deal.

A few weeks back, when the US, UK and Australian governments announced their surprise military pact, France wore the brunt of the...
October 5, 2021

UK Government £650 Billion Pipeline.

The UK Government has released plans for the investment of £650 billion of public and private cash into infrastructure projects across the...

Newsletter

Compelling research, insights and data directly into your inbox.

Recent media stories

Search

Scroll to Top